Participation Of Lac In Decision Making Social Work Essay

Participation Of Lac In Decision Making Social Work examineIntroductionThis essay aims to diminutively evaluate overhaul substance abuser involvement specifically for looked later on children (LAC). It explores demonstration and explore that conducts the value of get a lineing to the views of children who argon looked after regarding decisions close to the care and support they receive. It considers how Leicester urban center councils procedures change youthfulness plenty to contri excepte in decision-making about their care and support, whilst considering any barriers which whitethorn hinder useful interlocking. It also looks at how my work female genitalia support this view, whilst considering local and national legislative policies and theoretical frame whole shebang to conjure up familiarity of children and unripe person mickle to develop care run.Evidence-based amicable care is a conscientious, explicit and sharp use of evidence in making decisions about the care of children, which is based on skills which allow a social worker to evaluate personal experience and external evidence in a domineering and objective manner (Sackett et al 1997, cited in Smith, 20048). Evidence-based arise to decision-making needs to be transparent, accountable and based on consideration of the most compelling evidence. This means adopting an ethical obligation to justify claims to expertise, being foil with service users about decision-making and how these are formulated. By placing the childrens interests first, an evidence-based social worker may adopt a lifelong development that involves continually posing specific questions (hypothesis) whilst, searching objectively and efficiently for the current best practice (Gibbs, 2003).Evidence-based approach implies, among new(prenominal) things, the application of the best current evidence, the value of empirically based research determinations, the requirement of critical approach for assessment and theories which support evidence informed practice. Therefore, the use of research and evidence to enhance transparency for service users and stakeholders may increase objectivity and fairness in decision-making impact. This may increase confidence in the quality of debate around decisions, and lead to effective outcomes for service uses, thereby increasing credibility of go as well as supporting professional development for social workers.Evidence and research finding in alliance of LAC in decision-making and developing care runThe term participation is a all-inclusive and multi-layered concept used to describe many a nonher(prenominal) different processes. It covers the level, focus and content of decision-making as well as the nature of the participatory activity, frequency and duration of participation and children participation (Kirby et al., 2003). The level and nature of participation may vary. It may mean merely taking part, being present, being involved or consulted in decision-making or a transfer of power in order for the views of participants to discombobulate an influence on decisions (Boyden and Ennew, 1997). The focus of childrens participation also varies, with the participation of children and upstart mountain in matters which come upon them as individuals and as a chemical group (Franklin and Sloper, 20044).The participation of children and young people in decisions that affect them as individuals means taking into account their wishes, get holdings and their perspectives. Procedures such(prenominal) as, assessment, care planning and LAC review meetings, child protection conferences or complaints are there to achieve this. The baby birdren subroutine 1989 provides assessment for greater involvement of children and young people in decision-making. The participation of children in matters relating to them as a group can be through local and national identification, development, provision, monitoring or evaluation of services and po licies (Franklin and Sloper, 20045). This may be achieved through consultation exercises and research, involvement of children and young people in man mount upment committees, consultatory groups, youth forums, partnerships and community initiatives or in the delivery of community services by acting as mentors, counsellors, volunteers or workers (Sinclair and Franklin, 2000). look and evidence suggest that children and young people should be involved in making decisions that affect them. This is reflected in law, government guidance as well as in various regulations and policies. Increasingly, children are identified as a group in their own castigate. In 1991, the UK ratified the United Nations rule of the Rights of the Child (Child Convention), which grants children and young people the rights to go in in decision-making. Article 12 of the Child Convention provides that Children leave the right to say what they think should happen when adults are making decisions that affect th em, and to dupe their opinions taken into account. This may non necessarily mean that children and young people should directly make those decisions, rather that adults involve them in the decision-making process. The Care Standards Act 2000 highlights the impressiveness of childrens participation in decision-making.Looked after children are entitled and should be boost to recruit in the decision making-process. Policy documents and research relating to services for LAC and young people indicate the importance of their participation in decision-making both in insurance policy-making as well as in practice. Research studies have emphasised the value of engaging with the perspectives of LAC (doubting Thomas and Beckford, 1999 OQuigley, 2000). New initiatives from the Government such as the LAC Materials, persona Protects, the material for the Assessment of Children in claim and their Families, the Common Assessment Framework as well as other associated practice runs and non- governmental organisations have carried the same message (Jackson and Kilroe, 1996 Department of Health et al, 2000 Department of Health, 2002 Department for pedagogy and Skills, 2004 Jenkins and Tudor, 1999 Horwath, 2000 British Association of Social Workers, 2003). Standard textbooks on social work with children and families as well as medical specialist texts on particular areas of practice have emphasised not only the desirability of listening to LAC moreover also in many cases their right to inclusion (Brandon et al, 1998 Butler and Roberts, 1997, Gilligan, 2001 Wheal, 2002).Evidence and research are utilise in practice, particularly in the agencies that actually look after children and young people, the decision-making processes involving looked after children and in interactions amidst those children and adults. However, some indication may also be gained from social workers directly involved in see evidence and research findings and applying them into their practice (T homas, 2005). This can be evaluated in terms of looking at the organisations policies and procedures for looked after children in decision-making process, involving LAC to give advice of how to include them with planning and review meetings and service planning, such as supporting them to retrieve case-by-case advocacy, and give them opportunities to meet together, meet with their friends, and support their voice, for example to make complaints and to include their views when writing and enter decisions about them.However, social worker may be described as making significant efforts to listen to children and young people, but the children and young people may necessarily aspect that their voices are being heard. A study has found that whereas adults see listening in terms of paying respectful attention to what children and young people have to say, children and young people feel that listening is demonstrated by the delivery of services that accord with their expressed wishes (M cLeod, 2006). Also, whilst adults regard the role of social worker as providing emotional support and cure intervention, many children and young people regard their role as providing practical support combined with promotional material of their self-determination (McLeod, 2006). These findings have implications for childcare social work.Participation of LAC in decision-making in Leicester metropolis CouncilLeicester urban center Councils policy and guidance emphasise on the importance to involve children in the decision-making process in line with their age and understanding. Staff, carers, parents and children are informed about this policy through handbooks, workshops and interagency training events. Parents are informed by social workers, either formal, informal or both. The Leicester metropolis Council untested Peoples Charter states that young people have the right to be listened to, have their view taken seriously and to be involved in decisions that affect them. Leicester City Council has also a Children and Young Peoples Strategic Partnership (2007) which is committed to involve and consult as many children, young people and their families as possible. The aim of this participation strategy is to enable children, young people and families to participate in decision-making process, service review and delivery as well as to influence policies and decisions that affect them.Leicester City Council has a policy which actively promotes the involvement of LAC in planning and review meetings. As a department, it has sound responsibilities as corporate parents. The policy encourages LAC to attend any meeting where their Care Plan will be discussed and decision made about their lives. However, some children or young people I have been operative with feel that whether or not they attend the LAC planning and review meetings does not really make a difference because they consider those meetings to be merely procedural. A study has found that many children and young people find the review meetings as still alienating, uncomfortable, negative and boring process (Voice for the Child in Care, 2004, 51). The decision-making process may anterioritise the best interests of the child, which may not necessarily represent what the child may consider to be his/her best interest on his/her own world.Planning and review meetings for LAC are chaired by an independent person, who has a tariff to ensure that the views and feelings of children and young people are taken into account. However decision has to be made procedurally to meet the goals of the local billet, which may not take into account the needs of the child.Leicester City Council promotes the use of independent advocacy services for LAC, and makes provisions with representation when they make complaints. Leicester City Councils Children Rights and Participation serve works independently to ensure that children and young people participate in decision-making that affect them and that they are fully delineate in their complaints. However, the independence of this Service may be questionable. The head of the Service is responsible to the head of Safeguarding Services Department who is also responsible to the Director of Children Services, who may influence the Department in performing its functions. Leicester City Council provides opportunities for LAC to meet together. This is done through a Children Forum within the organisation which organises different activities, such as dramas, role plays, and singing to enable them to express their feelings. The Children Forum also has a looked after children football team led by a youth worker who is attached to the LAC Services.Leicester City Council has policy guidance which requires prior permission from children to stay with friends long. However, there can be conflicts of interests when considering Frazer/Gillick competence of young peoples voices. Firstly, the process of performing checks may take sequence as it invol ves collecting information relating to the host, some of which may not be purchasable before the proposed date of visit. This delay may cause the child or young person to feel that his/her wishes are not being considered and may also raise the childs level of anxiety.Secondly, young persons from another authority without checking requirements may be placed in the same placement with those from Leicester City Council. Those from Leicester City Council might feel not only that there are double standards, but they may also lose their institutionalise to the social worker involved in granting the permission. Children who have taken part in research meetings have resented that their ordinary social contacts were obstructed by requirements to get a special permission, or even practice of law clearance, before they could stay overnight with their friends, and wanted their carers to be able to make these decisions unimpeded (Thomas and OKane, 1998).As a social worker, it therefore, impor tant to be aware of legislative and guidance requirements of participation as well as understand the benefits of participation. As Kirby et al (2003) pointed out the fact that participation is part of the law or a public policy is not enough to convince social workers to engage in the work of children and young people. However, there are obstacles to the inclusion of LAC and young people in decision-making process. These include the lack of staff and time caused by high case loads and other demands such as child protection work, motor inn reports, and core assessments. There is also a lack of a common understanding of participation and this can be confusing for a social worker when working with other agencies with different understandings. Also, it may not cost a penny to listen to children and young people, but it cost money to ensure a development of an effective participation (Kirby, 2003). Organisations rarely dedicate a work out for participation (Cutler and Taylor, 2003).The notion of childrens participation in decision-making pertains to all children as a social group. However, historically, childrens participation has tended to focus on children in need. As a result, childrens participation has often been associated with forms of multiple disadvantage and social exclusion. LAC falls into the category of marginalised groups of children and young people. Young People with difficult life experiences are likely to have less confidence and self-esteem to participate in decision-making. For those who had their views and feelings not taken into account in the past, they are likely to be less actuate to participate in LAC planning and review meetings. If the past difficult experiences resulted from mistreatment by adults, they are likely not to trust the current adults intentions to engage them in participation. LAC may be subject to negative assumptions and stereotypes which may affect their full participation in decisions making (McNeish, 1999).Enhancing the participation of LAC in decision-makingIt is a good practice for carers to be empowered to make decisions for LAC wanting to stay with friends overnight, provided that they are able to assess the situation and make those decisions as if they were their own biological children. There should be a policy that explicitly allows for delegation to carers. For example, the Welsh collection Government has issued a guidance which makes it clear that criminal records checks should not be sought before an overnight stay, that decisions should in most circumstances be delegated to foster parents and residential care staff, and that looked after children should as distant as possible be granted the same permissions to take part in such unimpeachable age appropriate peer activities as would reasonably be granted by the parents of their peers (National Assembly for Wales billhook NAFWC 50/2004).Planning and review meetings should be chaired by a totally independent person, not mortal empl oyed by Leicester City council. One may argue that this may cause tension amongst independence provided by an outside Chair and the risk of alienating the child by having a rum at their review. However, a chair coming within the organisation may not be fully independent as s/he may also be under a duty to promote the vision and goals of the organisation which may conflict with his/her role.There is a need for an effective definition of participation which encompasses an understanding of participation as an activity and as a process aiming at achieving affirmative outcomes for LAC, young people and organisations. Establishing a shared definition of participation can be a challenge, but once identified, it can benefit the organisations in terms of being consistence in the participation of children and young people in decision-making. There is a need for participation work to be adequately resourced in a long term basis as this will enable change (Robson, et al, 2003). Alternatively , the current budget should ensure that it is resourced to the participation of children and young people, particularly LAC.Maybe consideration to the times of day for young people should be taking into account, when holding review meetings, and not having as many people attending, which could be intimidating. maybe the local authority could consider using text messages or social networks to get real feedback about the views of young people. Perhaps to work in a more child centred way the process of participation may have more meaning to the child or young person, rather than being a process driven exercise.ConclusionThere is plenty evidence and research findings on participation of LAC in decision-making and developing care services. They range from legislation, participation guidance, researches to academic works. All these influence social workers in practice. Leicester City Council attaches importance to the participation of LFC in decision-making. Nonetheless, participation of LAC means that children should be actively involved in the decision-making that affects them and the adults who have the responsibility for these children should ensure that their views and wishes are listened to and represented in decision-making.REFERECESBoyden, J. and Ennew, J. (1997) Children in Focus. A manual for participatoryresearch with children. Stockholm Rdda BarnenBrandon M, Schofield G and Trinder L, (1998) Social Work with Children, Basingstoke MacmillanButler I and Roberts G, (1997) Social Work with Children and Families acquire into practice, London Jessica Kingsley PublishersCulter, D. and Taylor, A. (2003) Expanding and Sustaining Involvement a Snapshot of Participation Infrastructure for Young People Living in England, London Carnegie Young People InitiativeDepartment for Education and Skills (2004) Integrated Childrens System London The stationary OfficeDepartment of Health (2002) audition, Hearing and Responding (Department of Health perform Plan Core princi ples for the involvement of children and young people, available at http//www.longtermventilation.nhs.uk/_Rainbow/Documents/Listening,%20Hearing,%20responding%20to%20Children..pdf accessed on 7/11/2012Department of Health, et al, (2000) Framework for the Assessment of Children in Need and their Families, London The Stationery OfficeFranklin, A and Sloper, P. (2004) Participation of Disabled Children and Young People in Decision-Making at bottom Social Services Departments, Quality Protect Research Initiatives, Interim Report York The University of YorkGibbs, L., (2003) Evidence-Based exert for the Helping Professions A Practical Guide with Integrated Multimedia, Brooks Pacific GroveGilligan R, Promoting Resilience A resource guide on working with children in the care system, London BAAF, 2001Horwath J (ed) (2000), The Childs World Assessing children in need, London Jessica KingsleyKirby, P. and Bryson, S. (2002) amount the Magic? Evaluating and ResearchingYoung Peoples Participat ion in Public Decision-Making London Carnegie Young People InitiativeKirby, P, et al (2003) Building a Culture of Participation, London Department for Education and SkillsJackson S and Kilroe S (eds) (1996), face After Children Good parenting, good outcomes, Reader, London HMSOJenkins J and Tudor K, (1999) Being Creative with Assessment and Action Records, Tonypandy Rhondda Cynon Taff Borough CouncilLeicester City Council (2007) Leicester City Children ad Young Peoples Strategic Partnership Participation Strategy Leicester Leicester City CouncilMcLeod, A., (2006) honour or Empowerment? Alternative Understandings of Listening in Childcare Social Work Adoption and Fostering, Vol. 30, pp. 43-52OQuigley A, (2000) Listening to Childrens Views The findings and recommendations of recent research, York Joseph Rowntree Foundation, 2000McNeish, D. (1999) From Rhetoric to Reality Participatory Approaches to health Promotion with Young People, London Health Education AuthorityRobson, P., et a l (2003) Increasing User Involvement in Voluntary Organisation, York Joseph Rowntree FoundationSinclair, R. and Franklin, A. (2000) Young Peoples Participation, Quality ProtectsResearch Briefing, No.3. London Department of HealthSmith, D (2004) Social Work and Evidence based Practice Research Highlights in Social Work, London Jessica Kingsley PublisherThomas, N., (2005) Has anything really changed? Managers views of looked after childrens participation in 1997 and 2004 Adopting and Fostering, Vol. 29, pp. 67-77Thomas C, and Beckford V, (1999) Adopted Children Speaking, London BAAFThomas N and OKane C. (1998), What makes me so different? Community Care 1253Voice for the Child in Care, (2004) Start with the Child, Stay with the Child A blueprint for a child-centred approach to children and young people in public care, London Voice for the Child in CareWheal A (ed.) (2002), The RHP mate to Leaving Care, Lyme Regis Russell House Publishing